Published by Anonymous on 3/03/2004 12:42:00 PM
Dave--If you're meaning your rogue, he won't be able to heal reliably for a couple levels.
Leon--Hmm... I admit that I haven't looked at the 3.5 ranger all that closely, but it just seems a lot better to me. The two main advantages the 3.0 ranger has: no adaptation needed, and the feats at 1st level. If the feats are an issue, there's no reason why they couldn't be shifted to 1st level, since I doubt Dustin's going to allow people to frontload by taking a single level of ranger. After 1st level, the 3.5 ranger seems to win hands down. There's also a significant difference in HD and Skill Points and the way Animal Empathy works. So why not combine the classes into the best of both worlds? Now the 3.0 rogue vs. 3.5 rogue, that's a case for allowing dual progressions. *shrugs* But whatever Dustin says, goes.
Leon--Hmm... I admit that I haven't looked at the 3.5 ranger all that closely, but it just seems a lot better to me. The two main advantages the 3.0 ranger has: no adaptation needed, and the feats at 1st level. If the feats are an issue, there's no reason why they couldn't be shifted to 1st level, since I doubt Dustin's going to allow people to frontload by taking a single level of ranger. After 1st level, the 3.5 ranger seems to win hands down. There's also a significant difference in HD and Skill Points and the way Animal Empathy works. So why not combine the classes into the best of both worlds? Now the 3.0 rogue vs. 3.5 rogue, that's a case for allowing dual progressions. *shrugs* But whatever Dustin says, goes.